A common misconception by some in top management is that predictive maintenance
(PdM) replaces or is separate from preventive
maintenance (PM). In actuality,
PdM
drives PM.
PM is a time-based approach whereby maintenance professionals perform scheduled
actions. Often, these actions are performed in the absence of data, but with good
intentions, as part of a well-established routine. Many of these actions are necessary
for the assets to continue to operate effectively, efficiently and safely. However,
the proper frequency and extent are not known because no two assets are exactly
alike, and the result is an inefficient use of capital.
Most reliability processes have aspects of
PdM, PM and reactive maintenance (RM).
Implementing
PdM
allows organizations to move from a time-based or routine maintenance schedule to
a maintenance schedule based on asset condition, specifically severity and likelihood
of failure. Simply, implementing
PdM
allows companies to shift from a reactive to proactive maintenance approach.
Assess Your Own Maintenance Process
Consider the questions below. Give yourself one point for each “yes” answer and
zero points for each “no” answer. Remember, honesty is the best policy!
Breaking the routine of reacting to problems instead of planning to prevent them
is not easy. It often involves a significant cultural change supported by data-based
results. However, most people agree that making this change is not an option for
companies to survive, it is a necessity.
Implementing
PdM
Within Your Reliability Process
|